Deutsch Welle, 16 July 2013
Leading industrialized nations have long sought a bigger chunk of tax revenue generated by multinational corporations. Now, they are finally collaborating on an action plan to dry up the tax loopholes.
Leading industrialized nations have long sought a bigger chunk of tax revenue generated by multinational corporations. Now, they are finally collaborating on an action plan to dry up the tax loopholes.
Large
multinational companies – whether it's Apple, Starbucks or Volkswagen – shift
their profits wherever they see a tax benefit and cover up the tracks. Such
maneuvering is legal for lack of rules and regulations on tax avoidance.
But that
could change. On July 19, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) aims to present a plan to curb the tax tricks of powerful
multinationals - a plan they hope will be implemented later by the 20 most
important industrialized and emerging economies - the G20. A first draft of the
action plan has been obtained by the German media. Its key message:
Corporations should pay taxes where the value of a product or service was
created, a requirement tailored to undermine profit-shifting.
How
transparent should corporate data be?
Under the
plan, multinationals must disclose all their various costs in all OECD
countries, including license expenses, earned interest, administration fees and
wages. “This is a strict set a rules, much stricter than anything we've seen
previously,” said tax expert Michael Bormann with bdp Venturis Management
Consultants. The rules, he added, would substantially hinder companies from
shifting profits generated in countries with higher taxes to those with lower
taxes.
![]() |
| Tax expert Michael Bormann views the planned rules as the strictist ever |
But Bormann
believes it will be legally difficult to enforce such transparency, pointing to
tax secrecy requirements that prevent disclosure to all citizens. Also, there
is no clear legal system to force only large corporations to total
transparency, he argues. “Establishing a limit for a certain sales amount is
very arbitrary,” he said.
Internet
companies as a special case
![]() |
| Markus Meinzer demands total transparency |
Meinzer
agrees. “Internet companies have no provable value,” he said. That's why he is
for taxing companies in the country where consumers purchase their products
online. “Clicks would be a good starting point to see where profits could be
taxed,” he said. After the first OECD draft, the ideas are to be integrated
into a new law by 2014.
This
approach, the experts agree, would prevent low-tax countries from using
favorable tax models to compete with other countries. There is also talk of
including non-OECD countries in the plan. “German tax authorities, who would
like to increase their tax revenue, believe it is only logical to be against
all nations with low taxes,” Bormann said. He views, however, that tax
competition can be useful and desirable but only if based on real businesses.
“Why shouldn't a country use a tax advantage to attract companies to establish
a local presence?” Bormann asked. Dealing with “letter-box” companies, he added,
would be simple; an international agreement, for instance, could stipulate that
if there were no business activities behind such a company, there would also be
no tax benefits.
Decision
not before September
![]() |
| The G20 will decide on a new tax evasion law in September |
The
official draft is to be presented on July 19 and will be discussed by the G20
prior to their summit in St. Petersburg in September. After that, large
multinationals may find that their tax tricks no longer work.
G20 backs plan to stop global tax avoidance and evasion - New
Amazon told: time is up for tax avoidance
Related Articles:
G20 backs plan to stop global tax avoidance and evasion - New
Amazon told: time is up for tax avoidance




No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.