![]() |
| (Photo of the constitution of 1814 by Grondwetfestival.nl, used with permission) |
However,
there is an unfortunate loophole: the law specifically talks about paper mail.
E-mail was never included and therefore exists in a legal limbo.
According to Internet lawyer Arnoud Engelfriet, the council of ministers of the
Netherlands has now proposed a change in the constitution that will not
actually name e-mail, but which will make the phrasing of Article 13 more
generic. A change in the constitution requires two consecutive parliaments to
vote for that change, the idea being that the change can be made an issue in
the elections.
Not that it
matters much, as the Dutch constitution, which is now 200 years old, is more of
a guideline than law. Judges are not allowed to ignore laws based on their
constitutionality. The constitution may be said to have a normative function,
for example, it could show courts how to interpret a vague law, but a 2009
study by the national government claims that this normative function is eroding
(PDF). Instead a societal function is emerging, as the constitution aims to
hold up a mirror to the citizens of the kingdom and to show us what our shared
values are.
See also:
an English translation of Article 13.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.