Wires allow
agencies to listen to or record live conversations, in what privacy campaigners
are calling a 'nightmare scenario'
The Guardian, Juliette Garside, Friday 6 June 2014
Vodafone, one of the world's largest mobile phone groups, has revealed the existence of secret wires that allow government agencies to listen to all conversations on its networks, saying they are widely used in some of the 29 countries in which it operates in Europe and beyond.
 |
| Vodafone has revealed the secret wires are widely used in the 29 countries it operates in. Photograph: Carl Court/AFP |
Vodafone, one of the world's largest mobile phone groups, has revealed the existence of secret wires that allow government agencies to listen to all conversations on its networks, saying they are widely used in some of the 29 countries in which it operates in Europe and beyond.
The company
has broken its silence on government surveillance in order to push back against
the increasingly widespread use of phone and broadband networks to spy on
citizens, and will publish its first Law Enforcement Disclosure Report on
Friday . At 40,000 words, it is the most comprehensive survey yet of how
governments monitor the conversations and whereabouts of their people.
The company
said wires had been connected directly to its network and those of other
telecoms groups, allowing agencies to listen to or record live conversations
and, in certain cases, track the whereabouts of a customer. Privacy campaigners
said the revelations were a "nightmare scenario" that confirmed their
worst fears on the extent of snooping.
In Albania,
Egypt, Hungary, India, Malta, Qatar, Romania, South Africa and Turkey, it is
unlawful to disclose any information related to wiretapping or interception of
the content of phone calls and messages including whether such capabilities
exist.
"For
governments to access phone calls at the flick of a switch is unprecedented and
terrifying," said the Liberty director, Shami Chakrabarti. "[Edward]
Snowden revealed the internet was already treated as fair game. Bluster that
all is well is wearing pretty thin – our analogue laws need a digital
overhaul."
In about
six of the countries in which Vodafone operates, the law either obliges
telecoms operators to install direct access pipes, or allows governments to do
so. The company, which owns mobile and fixed broadband networks, including the
former Cable & Wireless business, has not named the countries involved
because certain regimes could retaliate by imprisoning its staff.
Direct-access systems do not require warrants, and companies have no information about the identity or the number of customers targeted. Mass surveillance can happen on any telecoms network without agencies having to justify their intrusion to the companies involved.
Direct-access systems do not require warrants, and companies have no information about the identity or the number of customers targeted. Mass surveillance can happen on any telecoms network without agencies having to justify their intrusion to the companies involved.
Industry
sources say that in some cases, the direct-access wire, or pipe, is essentially
equipment in a locked room in a network's central data centre or in one of its
local exchanges or "switches".
The staff
working in that room can be employed by the telecoms firm, but have state
security clearance and are usually unable to discuss any aspect of their work
with the rest of the company. Vodafone says it requires all employees to follow
its code of conduct, but secrecy means that it cannot always verify that they
do so.
Government
agencies can also intercept traffic on its way into a data centre, combing
through conversations before routing them on to the operator.
"These
are the nightmare scenarios that we were imagining," said Gus Hosein,
executive director of Privacy International, which has brought legal action
against the British government over mass surveillance.
"I
never thought the telcos [telecommunications companies] would be so complicit.
It's a brave step by Vodafone and hopefully the other telcos will become more
brave with disclosure, but what we need is for them to be braver about fighting
back against the illegal requests and the laws themselves."
Vodafone's
group privacy officer, Stephen Deadman, said: "These pipes exist, the
direct access model exists.
"We
are making a call to end direct access as a means of government agencies
obtaining people's communication data. Without an official warrant, there is no
external visibility. If we receive a demand we can push back against the
agency. The fact that a government has to issue a piece of paper is an
important constraint on how powers are used."
Vodafone is
calling for all direct-access pipes to be disconnected, and for the laws that
make them legal to be amended. It says governments should "discourage
agencies and authorities from seeking direct access to an operator's
communications infrastructure without a lawful mandate".
All states
should publish annual data on the number of warrants issued, the company
argues. There are two types – those for the content of calls and messages, and
those for the metadata, which can cover the location of a target's device, the
times and dates of communications, and the people with whom they communicated.
For
brevity, the Guardian has also used the term metadata to cover warrants for
customer information such as name and address. The information published in our
table covers 2013 or the most recent year available. A single warrant can
target hundreds of individuals and devices, and several warrants can target
just one individual. Governments count warrants in different ways and New
Zealand, for example, excludes those concerning national security. While
software companies like Apple and Microsoft have jumped to publish the number
of warrants they receive since the activities of America's NSA and Britain's
GCHQ came to light, telecoms companies, which need government licences to
operate, have been slower to respond.
In America,
Verizon and AT&T have published data, but only on their domestic
operations. Deutsche Telekom in Germany and Telstra in Australia have also
broken ground at home. Vodafone is the first to produce a global survey.
It shows
that Malta is one of the most spied on nations in Europe. The former British
protectorate has a tiny population of 420,000, but last year Vodafone alone
processed 3,773 requests for metadata.
In Italy,
where the mafia's presence requires a high level of police intrusion, Vodafone
received 606,000 metadata requests, more than any other country in which it
runs networks. The number of warrants across all operators is potentially many
times that number, but the government does not publish a national figure for
metadata.
Italy's parliament
does disclose content warrants, however, and it issued 141,000 in 2012,
compared with just 2,760 in the United Kingdom. In contrast to the UK,
terrorism concerns mean Ireland does not allow any information on the number of
content warrants to be made public.
Spain,
which has suffered terrorist strikes from Islamists and Basque separatists,
allowed Vodafone to disclose that it had received over 24,000 content warrants.
Agencies in the Czech Republic made nearly 8,000 content requests from the
network. After Italy, the Czech Republic is the biggest user of metadata,
issuing 196,000 warrants nationally in the most recent year for which
information has been published. Tanzania, one of several African countries in
which Vodafone operates, made 99,000 metadata requests from the company.
Peter
Micek, policy counsel at the campaign group Access, said: "In a sector
that has historically been quiet about how it facilitates government access to
user data, Vodafone has for the first time shone a bright light on the
challenges of a global telecom giant, giving users a greater understanding of
the demands governments make of telcos. Vodafone's report also highlights how
few governments issue any transparency reports, with little to no information
about the number of wiretaps, cell site tower dumps, and other invasive
surveillance practices."
On the
question of whether the UK uses direct-access pipes, Vodafone's Deadman said
such a system would be illegal because Britain did not permit agencies to
obtain information without a warrant. The law does, however, allow
indiscriminate collection of information on an unidentified number of targets.
"We need to debate how we are balancing the needs of law enforcement with
the fundamental rights and freedoms of the citizens. The ideal is we get a much
more informed debate going, and we do all of that without putting our
colleagues in danger."
Snowden,
the National Security Agency whistleblower, joined Google, Reddit, Mozilla and
other tech firms and privacy groups on Thursday to call for a strengthening of
privacy rights online in a "Reset the net" campaign.
Twelve
months after revelations about the scale of the US government's surveillance
programs were first published in the Guardian and the Washington Post, Snowden
said: "One year ago, we learned that the internet is under surveillance,
and our activities are being monitored to create permanent records of our
private lives – no matter how innocent or ordinary those lives might be. Today,
we can begin the work of effectively shutting down the collection of our online
communications, even if the US Congress fails to do the same."
