Google – AFP, Jonathan Fowler (AFP), 28 April 2013
|
An object
made with a 3D printer on display at the "Inside 3D Printing"
exhibition in New York on April 22, 2013 (AFP, Emmanuel Dunand)
|
GENEVA — As
potentially game-changing as the steam engine or telegraph were in their day,
3D printing could herald a new industrial revolution, experts say.
For the
uninitiated, the prospect of printers turning out any object you want at the
click of a button may seem like the stuff of science fiction.
But 3D
printing is already here, is developing fast, and looks set to leap from the
labs and niche industries onto the wider market.
"There
are still limits imposed by the technology available today," said Olivier
Olmo, operational director of Switzerland's EPFL research institution.
"But
I'm certain that within 10 or 20 years, we'll have a kind of revolution in
terms of the technology being available to everyone," he said.
The
concept's roots lie in fields ranging from standard two-dimensional printing to
machine-tooling.
First, a 3D
digital design is created either from scratch on a computer or by scanning a
real object, before being cut into two-dimensional "slices" which are
computer-fed into a printer.
The printer
gradually deposits fine layers of material -- such as plastic, carbon or metal
-- and builds a physical object.
|
A visitor
looks at a 3D printer at the
"Inside 3D Printing" event in New York
on April 22, 2013 (AFP, Emmanuel
Dunand)
|
The product
can be as hard or as flexible as you programme the printer to make it, and even
include moving parts rather than being a solid block.
"In
theory, anything that we have today can be produced through 3D printing. It may
just alter manufacturing as we know it," said Simon Jones, a technology
expert at global law firm DLA Piper.
In addition
to the potential ecological impact of producing products right where they are
needed, Jones said, 3D printing could make small-scale production of objects
cheaper, rather than turning out huge numbers which may go to waste.
The uses go
beyond easy replication of things that exist already.
"The
technology offers possibilities that available manufacturing does not,"
said Carla van Steenbergen of i.materialise, a Belgium-based service that
prints designs for users.
Van
Steenbergen pointed to objects such as customised screws for broken bones which
match a patient's specific anatomical characteristics and thereby cause less
deterioration than the traditional variety.
"It's
the kind of thing that traditional technology won't allow. It's the kind of
area where the big added value lies, making the impossible become
possible," she underlined.
The
technology has been around for longer than many would think: the first commercial
3D print technology, known as stereo-lithography, was invented in 1994.
It has
taken time to inch into the limelight, however.
"It's
honest to say that 3D printing is far from the mainstream, but it's a sign that
something is happening," said Tristan Renaud of Prevue-Medical, a company
that turns out models from 3D medical imaging data.
His
technology chief Erik Ziegler said using online 3D printing services was likely
to remain the norm for a while, given printer costs.
|
Visitors
look at a 3D printer at the
"Inside 3D Printing" event in New York
on
April 22, 2013 (AFP, Emmanuel
Dunand)
|
An
alternative is provided by "Fablabs" -- short for "fabrication
laboratories" -- a concept created by the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology that offers grassroots access to small-scale manufacturing
facilities.
But for
those tempted by home-output, a handful of 3D printers have hit the consumer
market, retailing for around $2,000.
As with
computers, the price is expected to fall over time as demand rises and
technology advances.
Van
Steenbergen said that at the industrial level, 3D printing is not set to take
over from classical methods, but rather go hand in hand.
"I
think it will affect the manufacturing of some products, but it's never going
to replace it," she said.
It also
raises a raft of questions.
For
example, would a car manufacturer be ready to let a neighbourhood mechanic print
spare parts? And if such goods were produced under licence, what quality
guarantees would be offered to consumers?
On the
intellectual property front, what constitutes fair production of a replacement
part for something you already own? And would designers of 3D objects be
protected from an equivalent of file-sharing, bemoaned by the music industry?
"We'd
tend to see an increase in commercial impact," said Jones. "It would
be very difficult to prevent that once 3D technology got to a cost point that's
sensible."
Francis
Gurry, head of the UN's World Intellectual Property Organisation, underlined
that the global 3D printing business is forecast to be worth $3.7 billion by
2015.
In
contrast, world merchandise exports were worth $18.3 trillion last year, and
commercial services, $4.3 trillion.
Despite
remaining small in global terms, Gurry noted, the value of 3D printing is
expected to expand relatively fast, to $6.5 billion by 2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment