PC World, by
Jennifer Baker, IDG News, Apr 24, 2012
SIMILAR ARTICLES:
Europe's
top data privacy watchdog has strongly criticized the international
anticounterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA), warning that it could lead to
widespread monitoring of the Internet and breaches of individuals' right to
privacy.
The
agreement is poorly worded, lacks precision about what measures could be used
to tackle infringement of intellectual property rights online and could result
in the processing of personal data by ISPs that goes beyond what is allowed
under E.U. law, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) said in a
16-page opinion published Tuesday.
The opinion
also says that ACTA does not contain "sufficient limitations and
safeguards, such as effective judicial protection, due process, the principle
of the presumption of innocence, and the right to privacy and data
protection." It also warns that many of the measures to strengthen
intellectual property enforcement online could involve "the large scale
monitoring of users' behavior and of their electronic communications"
including emails, private peer-to-peer file sharing and websites visited.
ACTA aims
to enforce intellectual property rights and will enter into force after
ratification by six signatory states of the total 11 -- the European Union,
Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore,
Switzerland and the U.S. It was signed by the European Commission and 22 E.U.
member states in January, but before it can become E.U. law it must be approved
by the European Parliament.
However,
the international antipiracy pact has failed to win favor with
parliamentarians. And following large civil protests throughout Europe, many
E.U. countries are back-pedaling on their decision to sign the agreement. Most
have suspended ratification.
In an
effort to placate critics, the European Commission, the body responsible for
negotiating the agreement on behalf of the E.U., has asked the European Court
of Justice to rule on whether the deal is compatible with the E.U. Charter of
Fundamental Rights. But since the court will not evaluate the effectiveness or
proportionality of the measures within the agreement, nor the potential
outcome, anti-ACTA activists see it as nothing more than a time-wasting
exercise.
The
Parliament is expected to vote in June without waiting for the court ruling. It
seems that it will vote against the agreement, after the parliamentarian
charged with evaluating it, David Martin, recommended rejecting it.
The EDPS'
opinion puts a further nail in ACTA's coffin. In February 2010, the independent
supervisory authority, gave his first opinion on the treaty, which at the time
was being negotiated in secret. That opinion raised privacy concerns, but
Tuesday's document goes into more detail on the now public text.
ACTA
includes permission for countries to create laws whereby an online service
provider may be ordered by a "competent authority" to disclose the
identity of a subscriber to a right holder. The EDPS points out that the
"competent authority" is not defined. There is likewise no definition
of "commercial scale" mentioned elsewhere in the text.
Article 23
of ACTA appears to create new categories of criminal offenses without providing
for any legal definition of what they are, he continued. Generalized monitoring
of Internet users could affect millions of individuals irrespective of whether
they are under suspicion.
In short,
according to the EDPS, ACTA raises huge privacy concerns.
|
The anti-piracy proposals have prompted protests across Europe |
No comments:
Post a Comment